Thứ Ba, 30 tháng 6, 2015

2016 Scion iM Review

Born in Japan and raised in Europe, the 2016 Scion iM is primed to make its North American debut. Ready or not, this multicultural hatchback is on its way, but are company executives off their rocker thinking it’s a legitimate rival to established nameplates?

FAST FACTS

Engine: 1.8-liter four cylinder; 137 hp, 126 lb-ft
Transmission: Six-speed manual, CVT automaic
Fuel Economy: Up to 28 MPG city, 37 highway and 32 combined
Price: Starts at $19,255 including $795 in delivery fees

Old (World) Meets New

Essentially a rebranded version of the Toyota Auris, which went on sale in the old world earlier this year, Scion’s iM targets buyers younger than 35 like Kim Jong-Un’s artillery zeroing in on Seoul. Per usual, the capital T’s youth-focused brand aims to attract this coveted demographic with a unique buying process and customization options.
Arguably hip, young individuals are the folks this practical hatch is made for, be they aspiring ragtime musicians, freelance baristas or even recent college grads with degrees in interpretive pottery. According to Scion, the iM offers these cool customers sporty styling and dynamic handling wed to exceptional value, a blend of attributes competitors like the Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf or Mazda3may not offer.

Features Galore!

2016 Sion iM Interior 01
Perhaps the iM’s greatest strength is the content you get for the price you pay; it offers more bang for your buck than a steamer trunk of shotgun shells purchased at the Salvation Army on blue-tag day. And thanks to Scion’s mono-spec philosophy there’s only one version of the car available. Any enhancements of customizations are handled at dealers.

Offering more for less, this car comes standard with dual-zone climate control, a leather-wrapped steering wheel and an audio system with a seven-inch color display; Bluetooth, voice recognition and USB connectivity are baked right in like tart cherries inside a fruit cake. Additionally, there are eight airbags and just as many cup holders, plus heated side-view mirrors that power fold at the push of a button.
Dressing things up on the exterior, you get a unique body kit and 17-inch alloy wheels at no extra cost.
As for functionality, the iM offers just shy of 21 cubic feet of cargo space with the 60/40-split rear seat in the passenger-carrying position, and a metric s***ton more with those backrests folded flat. In short, this little Scion has plenty of room for a drum kit, full-size espresso maker or even a mobile kiln for backyard firings.
Further burnishing the iM’s value reputation, features like LED tail-lights, the sport body kit and dual-zone climate control are either not available or come bundled with expensive options packages in its key rivals.
2016 Sion iM Climate Control 01

Driving this point home, the car starts at $19,255 including $795 in delivery fees. Out the door, models equipped with an automatic transmission are just $740 pricier. Getting all of the abovementioned goodies at no extra charge means you’ll probably have enough money left over to start a microbrewery or even take up beekeeping at your local cooperative urban farm.
But if you’d rather splurge, there are a number of dealer-installed extras on the menu. You can get things like a navigation system, special body graphics and even a handful of TRD performance parts including a special air intake and lowering springs.

Bringing a Spoon to a Gunfight

All Scion iMs are motivated by a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine, serving up 137 horses and 126 lb-ft of torque. That’s roughly equivalent to 10 hipsters riding fixies at full tilt, seven if they’re pedaling to get mustache wax or something plaid, their hearts spurred on by the flames of desire.
2016 Sion iM Engine 03

You may not have a choice of engine but you can pick which transmission you want. A six-speed manual is standard but for folks that can’t handle three pedals a CVT is also offered. And if you opt for the gearless automatic it comes with something Toyota calls G AI-shift logic, which measures lateral loads while driving through corners and holds the transmission in a lower ratio for faster acceleration out of turns.
No doubt about it, the iM is down on power compared to its rivals. However, the tradeoff for this is greater fuel efficiency. When equipped with the manual this car is rated at 27 miles per gallon city and 36 highway. Combined it averages 31 MPG. The automatic is slightly more efficient, returning 28/37/32 on the same EPA loops. Either way the iM is quite thrifty, but you’ve got to believe Toyota wanted to see a “4” in the tens spot with those highway ratings. We sure did.

The Drive

Three-pedal versions of this Scion are a bit tricky to drive smoothly. The clutch is super light and its engagement point quite vague. Throw in an embarrassing paucity of low-RPM torque and you have a combination that can challenge even veteran motorists. Fortunately, hill-start assist is standard so you don’t roll backwards on inclines. Additionally, the iM’s shifter is less than satisfying, with long throws and quite a bit of sloppiness as it moves from gate to gate.
2016 Sion iM Side 01

Underway there’s some noticeable vibration right around 4,000 RPM; this harshness easily breaches the car’s NVH defenses where it can annoy the driver and occupants. Fortunately things smooth out at faster or slower engine speeds so feel free to adjust accordingly. This issue could be attributable to the prototype model we evaluated.
2016 Sion iM Badge 01
Given it’s lack of grunt you really need to keep this engine on the boil because there’s precious little thrust on tap, something that makes driving the iM during rush hour an issue as you can’t react very quickly to openings in traffic. Also, the engine becomes quite winded when climbing even modest grades. The hills surrounding Los Angeles, where we evaluated the car, proved to be quite daunting. Not surprisingly, altitude does it no favors either.

Regrettably, changing directions is not one of the iM’s strong suits. While negotiating corners the tiller is light and rather lifeless in your hands. Also, the car’s chassis doesn’t seem to have much interest in delinquent behavior. Pitching it into a tight turn is met with annoyance rather than exuberance. Overall the iM feels a little bit soft and somewhat disconnected. If you expect this car to drive like a Mazda3 or even a Ford Focus don’t get your hopes up; it’s fine for what it is but it’s not a class-leading experience.

Interior Time Out

Fortunately it’s not all doom and gloom. The iM’s interior is surprisingly premium, with elegantly textured soft materials and rich-looking hard plastics. Toyota spent a big chunk of change in here and it shows. Cushioned door uppers and a swath of contrast-colored vinyl running across the lower dashboard are particularly nice touches.
2016 Sion iM Back Seat 01

Ensuring passengers also have a pleasant experience, the back seat is quite spacious, with impressive leg- and head-room for the class. I fit back there reasonably well and I top out at an even six-feet tall. Additionally, the aft floor is nearly flat, meaning a third rider has plenty of foot space.

The Verdict

The 2016 Scion iM is loaded with standard equipment and is priced to sell, offering drivers quite a lot for relatively little. It’s a sound choice for the smartphone-and-Snapchat generation, though other demographics are sure to enjoy this vehicle’s attributes. However, true enthusiasts should look elsewhere.
This new hatchback is slated to go on sale September 1, which is just a couple months away. If you’re one of those trendy, younger-than-35 drivers feel free to grab a kale and quinoa smoothie and camp out at your local Scion store.

10 Cars the Ford Focus RS Has More Power Than

10 Cars the Ford Focus RS Has More Power Than
Ford means business with its new Focus RS hot hatch.
Get 20% off checkout at Enterprise.com. Save up to 50% when you rent a car from Enterprise! You'll always find Enterprise Car Rental Coupons 20% OFF at coupon4share.com
With the company confirming that the Ford Focus RS will pack 345 hp from its 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine, AutoGuide.com has decided to look up some cars that you might be surprised to learn has less power than the Focus RS.
SEE ALSO: 2016 Ford Focus RS Makes 345 HP

2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution – 291 hp

2015-mitsubishi-evolution-x

For decades, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has been a model synonymous with performance, sporting a turbocharged four-cylinder engine that tuners have taken to unimaginable figures. But straight from the factory, the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution packs 291 hp, a big difference compared to the Focus RS. In a way, it appears the Japanese automaker has given the Evolution the axe because it just can’t keep up with the competition.

2016 Subaru WRX STI – 305 hp

2016-subaru-wrx-sti

The 2016 Subaru WRX STi is cut from a similar mold as the Mitsubishi Evolution X: It provides turbocharged fun in an all-wheel-drive package. But even Subaru’s latest WRX STi model won’t be able to keep up with the Ford Focus RS, churning 305 hp from its 2.5-liter turbocharged Boxer four-cylinder engine.

2010 Ford Mustang GT – 315 hp

2010-ford-mustang-gt

Sure, it was nearly five years ago, but the 2010 Ford Mustang GT packing a naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V8 engine made 30 less horsepower than what the Ford Focus RS makes. Of course, the 2015 Ford Mustang GT has been drastically improved, now equipped with a 5.0-liter V8 with 435 hp. But let’s face it, who would have ever thought that a Focus would make more power than any Ford Mustang, especially with half the displacement?

1998 Toyota Supra Turbo – 320 hp

1998-toyota-supra-turbo

Many claim the Toyota Supra Turbo is the king of affordable Japanese sports cars, but the Ford Focus RS actually trumps the JDM darling when it comes to horsepower. Perhaps it’s a testament to how great the Toyota Supra MKIV really is, providing 320 hp more than 18 years ago. But still, a Focus makes more power than a Supra from the factory? How times have changed.

1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 – 320 hp

1998-chevrolet-camaro-z28

Here is even more American muscle that the new Focus RS hot hatch trumps: the 1998 ChevroletCamaro Z28 with 320 hp. We’re talking about a 5.7-liter V8 engine that makes less power than a turbocharged four-banger, so it’s becoming more evident that there is a replacement for displacement.

2015 Nissan 370Z – 332 hp

2016-nissan-370z

The Z nameplate has long represented Nissan’s sports car models, but sadly, even the 370Z can’t outperform the Focus RS when it comes to raw numbers. It puts up a good fight though, being only 13 hp shy of the Ford. It will be interesting to see how the two match up to one another when it comes to hitting the track.

2015 Audi S5 – 333 hp

2015-audi-s5

Not even German engineering is immune to the Ford Focus RS with the Audi S5’s 3.0-liter TFSI engine getting trumped by the small 2.3-liter turbocharged four-cylinder from Ford. And the S5 isn’t considered a slouch either, competing against the BMW 435i that has 300 hp.

2001 BMW M3 – 333 hp

2001-bmw-m3

Yeah, it’s a couple of generations old, but the BMW E46 M3 is a fan favorite. Believe it or not, its 333 hp doesn’t outnumber the Ford Focus RS despite the M3 being equipped with a 3.2-liter six-cylinder powerplant. Now, if the 2015 BMW M3 pulls up to the Ford Focus RS, that’s an entirely different story with the current M3 bringing 425 hp to the table.

2015 Porsche Cayman GTS – 340 hp

2015-porsche-cayman-gts

Seeing a Porsche model on the list isn’t a surprise, but the Cayman GTS? Really? Ford has even one-upped the German automaker’s “purist” sports car, which has 340 hp from its 3.6-liter six-cylinder engine.

1997 Chevrolet Corvette – 345 hp

1997-chevrolet-corvette

OK, so maybe the Ford Focus RS isn’t more powerful than the 1997 Chevrolet Corvette, but you have to be surprised to hear that it has the same power as one of America’s most iconic sports cars. The C5 Vette initially hit the market with an LS1 engine in the form of a 5.7-liter V8. Now, it’s an entirely different story with the Corvette Stingray coming with 455 hp standard.

2015 MINI Cooper S Countryman ALL4 Consumer Review

The Countryman is the big dog in MINI’s modern family, but should you add it to yours?

FAST FACTS

Engine: 1.6 L turbocharged four-cylinder engine, 181 HP, 177 lb-ft.
Transmission: Six-speed automatic
Fuel economy (US): 23 MPG city, 30 MPG highway, 22.2 MPG observed average
Fuel economy (CDN): 10.1 L/100 km city, 7.8 L/100 km highway, 10.6 L/100 km observed average
Price (US): Cooper S Countryman ALL4 begins at $28,700 after destination charges, $37,850 as tested.
Price (CDN): Cooper S Countryman ALL4 begins at $31,605 after destination charges, $38,365 as tested.
A quasi-crossover, the Countryman is the only MINI Cooper to offer five-doors and all-wheel drive in one package. Although the regular MINI Cooper hardtop was new last year, the next generation Countryman has yet to go on sale.
In the meantime, the current Countryman continues to be offered in a myriad of configurations aimed to satisfy almost anyone. Being the most family-friendly of the MINI lineup, we decided you put Amanda, our general consumer, into one for evaluation. We opted for a MINI Cooper S Countryman ALL4 equipped with the six-speed automatic and a few option packages. This is what she thought of this MINI crossover.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9003

The Specs

Even though the Cooper Countryman is the largest MINI offering, it is still rather compact as its overall length of 162.2 inches is just a few inches longer than a Honda Fit. Inside, a tall roof leads to a generous 40 inches of headroom for front and rear passengers, but rear legroom is a cramped 33.8 inches. Rear cargo room is a bit more appealing as 17.5 cubic feet of space is available behind the rear seats, expanding to 42.2 cubic feet with the seats folded down.
SEE ALSO: 2011 MINI Countryman S ALL4 Review [Video]
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9007
The Countryman is available with two engine choices, but if the all-wheel drive ALL4 model is selected, so is the more powerful 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine to motivate the car’s 3,208-lb. curb weight. Power from this engine is officially listed at 181 HP and 177 lb-ft. of torque and can be paired to a six-speed manual transmission or a six-speed automatic like the one in Amanda’s test car.

Pricing for the MINI Cooper Countryman begins at $23,600 after destination charges while the Cooper S Countryman ALL4 begins at $28,700. As configured, the Countryman pictured here rings in at $37,850 thanks to options like the Cold Weather, Technology and Loaded packages plus much more.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9004

How Does it Drive?

Amanda really enjoyed the size of the vehicle since she likes small hatchbacks, but normally finds they don’t quite suit her needs. Not a fan of normal crossovers, she likes the fact that the Countryman sits somewhere between a normal car height and a compact crossover because it gives her a better view of the road without the large step-in height.
During her extremely cold test week, Amanda didn’t always let the car warm up before starting out on her daily commute and she loved the fact the engine and transmission operated smoothly even in the cold. She also found that the ALL4’s all-wheel drive system works well in snowy, wet conditions and that the brakes are very smooth, even during hard stops.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9008

The View from Inside

Amanda’s first drive in the Countryman was on a very cold morning and although the seat heater warmed up quickly, the rest of the car took a while to follow suit, despite its small size. She finds the driver seat to be comfortable and easy to adjust. She also says the dashboard is a little busy but is laid out quite well, which makes it easy to use on the go.

What She Liked

Initially she didn’t like the looks of the Countryman as it lacks that same cool factor of the regular MINI Cooper hardtop. But, as the week went, on the looks grew on her and she found it still had more style than other stylish tall hatchbacks like the Fiat 500L.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9002
The navigation system takes a little getting used to, but she said it is easy to use once you understand it. The GPS also recalculates fairly quickly which is an added bonus to her.

SEE ALSO: 2015 MINI Countryman Video, First Look
The MINI Cooper Countryman has a short windshield at a fairly upright angle. This means there is a longer roof overhang in front of Amanda which helped block the sun from her eyes enough that she skipped wearing sunglasses more often than normal.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9009

What She Didn’t Like

Amanda’s biggest complaint is how long it takes for the Countryman to heat up on days where the temperature was below -5 degrees Fahrenheit. Above zero, the Countryman warms up much sooner and the super-hot seat heaters don’t seem as necessary. She also wished a heated steering wheel came with the Countryman at the $38,000 price point.
Finally, she said the navigation system starts warning of an upcoming turn earlier than it needs to, something that gets to be annoying quickly.
MINI-Cooper-S-Countryman-9005

The Verdict

Overall, Amanda likes the MINI Countryman’s sophisticated feel and refined driving behavior. It’s nice getting into it every day and she would love to own one, but its price is the biggest barrier. As equipped, it’s hard for her to quantify its value. Although cheaper versions of the Countryman do exist, she wouldn’t be as taken with the not-so-MINI without its premium features.

Top 10 Japanese Sports Cars of the ’90s

Top 10 Japanese Sports Cars of the ’90s
Japanese auto manufacturers were at the top of their game in the ’90s.
There seemed to be an unwritten code that every Japanese automobile needed to have performance baked into its design. In Japan, dozens of enthusiast-focused vehicles hit the streets ranging from micro city cars to SUVs. Legends like the Skyline GT-R, Lancer Evolution, Impreza WRX STI and Stagea 260RS were born.
But you won’t see any of those cars on this list, because this is a Top 10 list of Japanese sports cars we actually got in America during the ’90s. True, a lot of the most amazing Japanese sports cars never made it overseas, but we weren’t completely denied. Even if the Celica GT-Four and Civic Type-R never made it to our shores, there were still plenty of amazing Japanese sports cars we could drive during this time period. Their time here may have been brief, and most have since disappeared like the dinosaurs, but like those beasts of old, we remember these legendary Japanese sports cars.
Here are the top 10 Japanese sports cars of the ’90s.

10. Nissan 240SX

It’s a Japanese sports car with 155 HP being sent to the rear wheels. No, this isn’t the 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata, it’s the Nissan 240SX. With a relatively low curb weight of 2,700 lbs. for a rear-wheel drive compact coupe, the 240SX came with a naturally aspirated 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine that as of 1991-onward made 155 HP. Although that may seem a bit weak, in the early 1990s most compact cars weren’t making that much power and nearly all weren’t rear-wheel dive like the 240SX.
With excellent handling and natural steering feel, the 240SX was a hit with the budget enthusiast. Twenty years later the 240SX lives on as a darling of the drifter world for its small, lightweight, rear-wheel drive body shell.

Mitsubishi-Eclipse

9. Mitsubishi Eclipse

Long before the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Subaru Impreza WRX STI made their way to North America, another turbocharged, all-wheel drive Japanese sports car was available – the Mitsubishi Eclipse. Like the Nissan 240SX, there were two generations of the Eclipse in the 1990s.
The first generation Eclipse could be had as an Eagle Talon or a Plymouth Laser as well. The most potent version of the first gen cars came with a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine making 195 HP that could power just the front wheels or all four.
For the second generation Eclipse only the Eagle Talon lived on as its twin and the body received curvier, more modern sheet metal. The most powerful engine was a new 2.0-liter turbo four-banger that put out 210 HP and could once again be had with either front- or all-wheel drive.

8. Acura Integra Type-R

The Acura Integra Type-R may be the epitome of front-wheel drive performance vehicles. Although it isn’t the fastest FWD car ever made, it may well be the rawest and most engaging. With a 1.8-liter four-cylinder that made 195 HP and could scream up to 8,400 rpm, the amount of power produce per liter by the Integra Type R was staggering.
SEE ALSO: Top 10 Honda Civics of All Time
For those serious about performance, curb weight could be kept well under 2,600 lbs. by skipping options like air conditioning on earlier models. With a Helical LSD, less sound deadening, a thinner windshield, strengthened body structure and revised suspension, the Integra Type R was basically a compact race car for the street.

7. Mazda MX-5 Miata

What hasn’t been said about the Mazda MX-5 Miata? Taking the British roadster concept of fun, engaging, open air motoring and adding Japanese livability and reliability, the MX-5 Miata was an instant hit. Starting with a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine making 116 HP, the 1990 MX-5 weighed less than 2,100 lbs.
SEE ALSO: Top 10 Best Mazda MX-5 Miata Models of All Time
By then end of the decade, many special additions of the Miata would come ago and the power would steadily increase. By 1999 a special 10th anniversary edition could be had with a 1.8-liter engine making 140 HP, a six-speed manual transmission, a LSD and Bilstein shocks.

Mitsubishi-3000GT

6. Mitsubishi 3000GT

The Mitsubishi 3000GT was a technological tour de force. Items available on the big 2+2 sports coupe included all-wheel drive, four-wheel steering, a two-mode exhaust system, active aerodynamics and an electronically controlled suspension.
Through the 1990s, the 3000GT would go through three iterations, although the car’s basic shape style and would remain. Initially, the most powerful 3000GT came with a 3.0-liter turbocharged V6 that made 296 HP and 306 lb-ft of torque. By the middle of the decade power had increased to 320 HP and 315 lb-ft. of torque to better match its Japanese competitors.
The biggest issue plaguing the 3000GT throughout its run was weight. Fully loaded, the Mitsubishi sports car nearly tipped the scales at 3,800 lbs. That may not sound that heavy by today’s standards, but in the early 1990s that was quite portly.

Toyota-MR2

5. Toyota MR-2

In 1990, Toyota’s little mid-engine sports coupe grew up to be sexier and sportier. Now significantly heavier, the MR2 did receive a big shot in power. Base models came with a 2.2-liter four-cylinder engine making 130 HP, which wasn’t bad in a well-balanced car weighing less than 2,600 lbs. But those who wanted serious performance could step up to the turbocharged model whose 2.0-liter engine put out a powerful 200 HP.
Known to be a bit tail-happy, the MR2 Turbo could be very fast in the right hands. In a straight line, it was no slouch either as 60 MPH could be attained in around six-seconds. Overall, the Toyota MR2 was a great car for those who wanted an Acura NSX or even a Ferrari, but couldn’t afford one.

4. Nissan 300ZX

Like a lot of Japanese sports cars, the 1990s ushered in a new era for the Nissan 300ZX. Larger, sexier and more powerful, the ‘Z32’ 300ZX as it is referred to could be had with a 3.0-liter turbocharged V6 engine that made 300 HP and 283 lb-ft. of torque. Although those numbers don’t quite match the Mitsubishi 3000GT’s output, the Nissan 300ZX was significantly lighter with base turbo models weighing a hair over 3,300 lbs.
The 300ZX could of course come without a turbocharged engine. And like a lot of sports cars of the time, the 300ZX could be had as a hardtop, T-top or a convertible. Unlike a lot of other cars, it could also be had as a pure two-seat sports car or in a four-seat, 2+2 configuration.
With a well-tuned chassis, sport-orientated suspension and active rear steering, the 300ZX was one of the fastest Japanese sports car of the 1990s.

Mazda-RX-7-01

3. Mazda RX-7

Although it was only offered for a few short years in North America, the third generation Mazda RX-7 was something special. The peak of the rotary engine, the 1991 Mazda RX-7 came equipped with a familiar 1.3-liter rotary engine, but now featuring sequential turbochargers that gave it 255 HP and 217 lb-ft. of torque.
SEE ALSO: Retro Ride: 1993 Mazda RX-7 Review
Those numbers pale in comparison against the other super Japanese sports cars, but the RX-7 was substantially lighter, weighing just 2,800 lbs. With a willing chassis, instant response from the rotary engine and balanced weight distribution, the RX-7 was a force to be reckoned with.
Sadly, a high price tag, poor fuel efficiency and horrible emissions doomed the third generation RX-7’s fate on our shores shortly after it was introduced.

2. Acura NSX

The Acura NSX is another car that needs no introduction. Proving that supercars could be had as a livable, everyday driver, the Acura NSX turned the world of exotic cars upside down. Initially available with a naturally aspirated 3.0-liter V6 engine, the NSX made 270 HP (or 252 HP with an automatic transmission).
As the decade rolled on, the NSX received a 3.2-liter V6 engine that upped power to 290 HP. But like the Mazda RX-7 and Toyota MR2, the NSX wasn’t about all-out power. It was a car set-up with amazing chassis response, near perfect steering and a human-machine interaction not found in many other cars.

1. Toyota Supra

It really is a tossup whether the NSX or Supra deserves to be at the top of this list. But with its monstrous 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six engine, the Supra unleashed 320 HP and 315 lb-ft of torque. With power like the Mitsubishi 3000GT but a curb weight more like the Nissan 300ZX, the Supra was one of the fastest cars to come out of Japan in a straight line.
With great weight distribution, grippy tires and a well-tuned suspension, the Supra could dispatch with a corner just as easily. Sadly, by 1996 the Supra turbo monster was only available with an automatic transmission and the car would disappear altogether shortly after.
But while it was around, not much could keep with the Toyota Supra.